Imminent

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)

The world's most consequential AI law; turnover-based fines. Art. 12 logging + Art. 19 log keeping + Art. 14 human oversight map directly to RECORD + ALLOW.

Read the authoritative text — EUR-Lex — Official Journal of the European Union

controls covered

+ 4 your-process controls below

Human oversight — intervene/override/halt

Art. 14

Fully covered

Allow

“… to intervene in the operation of the high-risk AI system or interrupt the system through a ‘stop’ button or a similar procedure that allows the system to come to a halt in a safe state.”Art. 14(4)(e)

HITL gate + deny + override at the enforcement point.

Automatic event logging, ≥6-mo retention

Art. 12 / 26(6)

Fully covered

Record

“High-risk AI systems shall technically allow for the automatic recording of events (logs) over the lifetime of the system.”Art. 12(1)

Merkle+TSA signed audit + configurable retention; agent identity gives traceability.

Log immutability hardening

Art. 12

Fully covered

Record

“In order to ensure a level of traceability of the functioning of a high-risk AI system that is appropriate to the intended purpose of the system, logging capabilities shall enable the recording of events relevant for … identifying situations that may result in the high-risk AI system presenting a risk …”Art. 12(2)

WORM append-only + content-hash-at-ingest shipped; HSM key anchoring staged.

Log keeping — retention ≥ 6 months

Art. 19 / 26(6)

Fully covered

Record

“Providers of high-risk AI systems shall keep the logs referred to in Article 12(1), automatically generated by their high-risk AI systems, to the extent such logs are under their control. Without prejudice to applicable Union or national law, the logs shall be kept for a period appropriate to the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system, of at least six months, unless provided otherwise in the applicable Union or national law, in particular in Union law on the protection of personal data.”Art. 19(1)

Signed enforcement receipts with configurable retention; the Team (365-day) and Enterprise (custom) tiers clear the six-month floor for providers and deployers alike.

Risk management system

Art. 9

Your process

Process

“A risk management system shall be established, implemented, documented and maintained in relation to high-risk AI systems.”Art. 9(1)

This one is your organization's own process; VisIQ supplies the evidence behind it. We feed enforcement telemetry into the RM system; we are not the RM system.

Data & data governance

Art. 10

Partial

Isolate

“Training, validation and testing data sets shall be subject to data governance and management practices appropriate for the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system.”Art. 10(2)

Partially covered today — Runtime data minimization/redaction; training-data quality/bias governance is yours.

Technical documentation

Art. 11

Your process

Record

“The technical documentation of a high-risk AI system shall be drawn up before that system is placed on the market or put into service and shall be kept up-to date. The technical documentation shall be drawn up in such a way as to demonstrate that the high-risk AI system complies with the requirements set out in this Section …”Art. 11(1)

This one is your organization's own process; VisIQ supplies the evidence behind it. We generate runtime evidence that feeds the conformity file, not the dossier itself.

Accuracy / robustness / cybersecurity

Art. 15

Partial

Isolate

“High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way that they achieve an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity, and that they perform consistently in those respects throughout their lifecycle.”Art. 15(1)

Partially covered today — Scope confinement + cyber controls; model-accuracy validation is yours.

QMS + conformity + CE + registration

Arts. 17/43/48/49

Your process

Process

“Providers of high-risk AI systems shall put a quality management system in place that ensures compliance with this Regulation.”Art. 17(1)

This one is your organization's own process; VisIQ supplies the evidence behind it. Quality system / notified-body conformity / CE marking are governance processes.

Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment

Art. 27

Your process

Process

“Prior to deploying a high-risk AI system … deployers that are bodies governed by public law, or are private entities providing public services … shall perform an assessment of the impact on fundamental rights that the use of such system may produce. For that purpose, deployers shall perform an assessment consisting of:”Art. 27(1)

This one is your organization's own process; VisIQ supplies the evidence behind it. The FRIA is a customer document.

Source of truth

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — the EU Artificial Intelligence Act

The European Union's law for artificial intelligence. For high-risk AI systems it sets binding design and operating requirements — risk management, data governance, record-keeping, transparency, human oversight, and robustness — and gives deployers their own duties, with penalties that scale to global turnover.

EUR-Lex — Official Journal of the European Union

Risk management, data governance and technical documentation

Chapter III, Section 2 — Arts. 9–11

Section 2 sets the design-level requirements every high-risk AI system must meet before and while it is in use, beginning with how risk, data and documentation are managed.

Art. 9(1)

“A risk management system shall be established, implemented, documented and maintained in relation to high-risk AI systems.”

Art. 9(2)

“The risk management system shall be understood as a continuous iterative process planned and run throughout the entire lifecycle of a high-risk AI system, requiring regular systematic review and updating.”

Art. 10(1)

“High-risk AI systems which make use of techniques involving the training of AI models with data shall be developed on the basis of training, validation and testing data sets that meet the quality criteria referred to in paragraphs 2 to 5 whenever such data sets are used.”

Art. 10(2)

“Training, validation and testing data sets shall be subject to data governance and management practices appropriate for the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system.”

Art. 11(1)

Record-keeping, human oversight and robustness

Chapter III, Section 2 — Arts. 12–15

The same Section then fixes the operating duties that apply while the system runs: automatic event logging, effective human oversight with a genuine ability to intervene, and resilience against attack.

Art. 12(1)

“High-risk AI systems shall technically allow for the automatic recording of events (logs) over the lifetime of the system.”

Art. 12(2)

Art. 14(1)

“High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way, including with appropriate human-machine interface tools, that they can be effectively overseen by natural persons during the period in which they are in use.”

Art. 14(4)(d)

“… to decide, in any particular situation, not to use the high-risk AI system or to otherwise disregard, override or reverse the output of the high-risk AI system;”

Art. 14(4)(e)

“… to intervene in the operation of the high-risk AI system or interrupt the system through a ‘stop’ button or a similar procedure that allows the system to come to a halt in a safe state.”

Art. 15(1)

Art. 15(5)

“High-risk AI systems shall be resilient against attempts by unauthorised third parties to alter their use, outputs or performance by exploiting system vulnerabilities.”

Obligations of providers and deployers

Chapter III, Section 3

Section 3 binds the operators. Providers must keep the logs their high-risk systems automatically generate for at least six months, and deployers — the organizations that USE high-risk AI systems — carry parallel duties: assign competent human oversight, keep the system's logs, and assess the impact on people before certain deployments.

Art. 19(1)

Art. 26(2)

“Deployers shall assign human oversight to natural persons who have the necessary competence, training and authority, as well as the necessary support.”

Art. 26(6)

“Deployers of high-risk AI systems shall keep the logs automatically generated by that high-risk AI system to the extent such logs are under their control, for a period appropriate to the intended purpose of the high-risk AI system, of at least six months, unless provided otherwise in applicable Union or national law, in particular in Union law on the protection of personal data.”

Art. 27(1)

Art. 27(1)(e)

“… a description of the implementation of human oversight measures, according to the instructions for use;”

Quality management, conformity, CE marking and registration

Arts. 17, 43, 48, 49

Before a high-risk AI system reaches the market, its provider must operate a documented quality management system, pass the applicable conformity assessment, affix CE marking (Art. 48, a duty assigned to the provider by Art. 16(h)), and register the system — organizational processes the regulation assigns to the provider.

Art. 17(1)

“Providers of high-risk AI systems shall put a quality management system in place that ensures compliance with this Regulation.”

Art. 43

Article 43 sets out which conformity-assessment procedure a high-risk AI system must pass — internal control or an assessment involving a notified body — before it may be placed on the market.

Art. 48(3)

“The CE marking shall be affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly for high-risk AI systems.”

Art. 49

Article 49 requires registration of the high-risk AI system in the EU database before it is placed on the market or put into service.